Currently, the nation’s health care landscape is shifting towards integrated systems and coordinated care, which necessitates hospital integration (such as mergers) to create sustainable market conditions for hospital care and services. This shift has naturally occurred within the health care industry and has been further fueled by health care policies that envision a more efficient, value-based health care delivery and payment system, as well as an increasingly complex health care regulatory environment that is difficult and resource-intensive for an individual hospital or a physician group to navigate.
Increased hospital integration also is due, in part, to substantial public sector reductions in hospital funding, and therefore hospitals must adapt to changing economic and financial factors. The priority of any integration is to keep hospitals open, preserve or expand patients’ access to care and continue to provide consistent, quality care 24/7 to every patient treated in a hospital. By pursuing mergers and other integration efforts, hospitals are able to maintain their presence in the community and protect patient access to essential and quality care.
In 2018, an American Hospital Association survey, In Hospital Mergers: Foundation for a Modern, Efficient and High-Performing Health Care System of the Future, conducted by Charles River Associates, found that mergers of hospitals within 30 miles of each other generated savings of more than $6.6 million in annual operating expenses at acquired hospitals.
Further, in January 2013, the Center for Healthcare Economics and Policy released a comprehensive analysis of hospital integration studies, including 75 studies spanning the years 1996-2013, as well as 36 primary sources. The Center’s analysis outlines improvements in health care for communities that result from mergers, including:
- Significant benefits to communities and patients in markets where hospitals remain open
- Preserved and expanded access to essential medical care
- Improved service offerings and quality of care
- Sustained and necessary investment in technology, facilities and health IT
- Sensible reduction in excess capacity
- More competitive health care markets
The Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice have primary responsibility for ensuring that hospital realignments are in compliance with federal antitrust laws, including the Sherman Act of 1890, the Clayton Act of 1914 and the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914. As the health care landscape shifts, these federal agencies conduct public outreach to examine activities and trends that may affect competition in the evolving health care industry. They also use their authority to review and approve or even unwind hospitals mergers, if necessary.
As the health care landscape continues to evolve and the industry moves increasingly towards the goals of integrated care and coordinated health systems, FAH will continue its efforts to inform the public conversation about health care competition and hospital integration. It is imperative that this issue is put in proper context, and focus is placed more holistically on the total landscape and not just pricing impact.
FAH Outlines Priorities for Congressional Republicans’ Healthy Future Taskforce Affordability Subcommittee
Patient and Community Benefits of Realignment